Search this blog

Showing posts with label Minoan art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minoan art. Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 June 2011

Artwork of the day

The “Ladies in Blue” Fresco, c. 1650-1550 BC, Archaeological Museum, Herakleion, Crete


The “Ladies in Blue” fresco from Neopalatial Knossos illustrates a group of three women of high esteem in rich costumes who aim at the retention of their power and at the improvement of their social status by adopting new symbols of differentiation such as the elaborate hairstyle. The fresco dates to 1650-1550 BC and it has been greatly restored. The white-skinned ladies with the graceful posture of their arms, the exposed breasts and the elaborate hair and jewellery are depicted while conversating with each other perhaps during a court festival or another important social or religious ceremony. They might be goddesses or just court ladies who want to show how important they are.
The elaborate hairdressings of the “Ladies in Blue” seem to have characterized the rich ladies of the New Palace Period who adopted them in important ceremonial events. According to Minoan iconography the shift from the hat to the long hair or elaborate hairdressings that predominate in the New Palace Period is said to have reflected the choice of high status women who stressed the head significance because they wanted to differentiate themselves from the total of women as soon as the latter started using the hat as part of their attire. In other words this stylistic change served to promote the ideological strategies of the dominant groups of women that emerged in the Neopalatial Period and wished to differentiate themselves from the rest of women by keeping a distance from them and simultaneously by emphasizing the stylistic details of their social group.

Today's artwork is a generous contribution of Eleftheria Pavli, BA, MA

Monday, 16 May 2011

Minoan Landscape Frescoes- Part 2


Aerial View of the Palace of Knossos
The religious interpretation of Minoan Landscape Frescoes might prevail in the scholarly world, however there are other views concerning their function, some of which are very interersting giving new dimensions to a civilization that is often presented as purely theocratic and religious oriented. Chapin (2004: 59-61) presents a very convincing argument on the possible political function of the frescoes. She suggests that as all frescoes are part of palaces or villas, they were supposed to be viewed by a certain elite who would not only have access to them but would also identify themselves and their power in it. Art was therefore a means of exclusion and class division inside society. The patrons and consumers of art were the members of a Neopalatial elite who controlled access to the palaces and villas and therefore all that was incorporated in them. When the ordinary Minoans entered these places, Chapin (2004: 60) concludes they were overwhelmed by the magical landscapes they encountered, landscapes that would be inextricably connected to the upper class that owned them. Art therefore served not only a religious function (Chapin does not deny the religious meaning of the paintings but she considers an additional role as well) but also served as a strong communication tool and a social instrument used by the ruling elites –who are able to patronize and obtain artworks- in order to create, promote and legitimize political structures. Art in this case is a means to a very specific end. This of course presupposes the existence of an audience who will receive the message of the artwork. This is not a new idea in the interpretation of works of art. Simpson (1982: 266) speaks explicitly of messages and statements in art objects sent by the author who is usually the king /ruler to a certain group of people who can of course be his subjects, enemies or possible enemies. This is true not only in the Minoan context but in the wider Near Eastern area. For example, the Neo-Assyrian reliefs presenting the king victorious over natural and human forces addressed a very specific message to any possible invaders: the king and the Assyrian Empire were invincible (Winter 1981: 3). Actual gardens appear in Assyrian reliefs and particularly during the reigns of Assurnasirpal II and Sargon who presented through them the bounty from their expeditions, the richness of their kingdom and their legitimate and undeniable power (Stronach 1990: 171-172). In Egypt, in private contexts, the representation of flower gardens in art gave a higher social status to its owner (Schäfer 1989: 84). Indeed, in societies where writing was not widespread, where government was based on the divine or semi divine legitimacy of a king or a ruling elite, image substituted the role now played by written text (Winter 1981: 2). Images, then as now, are able to arouse strong feelings, being thus a very powerful tool for communication. They often tell more than words will ever be able to say and the reaction the viewer has to them is more direct.

Wednesday, 11 May 2011

Minoan Landscape Frescoes - Part 1


Minoan landscape frescoes include representations of both plants and animals often in the presence of humans (Steel 2009). In fact, as Shaw (1993: 661) states nature is one of the most common themes that appear in Aegean art. Nature in this case includes flowers, trees, fields, mountains and caves, rivers, birds and animals. Plants include crocuses, irises, ivy, olives, lilies, myrtles, acacia, sea daffodils and papyrus, along with hybrid combinations that do not exist in real landscapes (Steel 2009 & Chapin 2004: 275). The most prominent animals are wild goats (often called agrimia), cats and monkeys, while the human figures most of the times represent females (Steel 2009 & Rehak 1992: 168-169). What did these images mean to the Minoans? One of the most prominent interpretations is that the frescoes have religious meaning and function. As the Minoan civilization is very often seen as a theocratic society, this interpretation is the one that is mostly put forward especially from the second half of the 20th century onwards.Chapin (2004: 56) discusses the presence of hybrid flowers that are depicted in Minoan frescoes but would never occur in real landscapes. As the Minoans were able to depict nature in very realistic forms (as can be seen in other frescoes depicting fauna and flora), Chapin suggests that the hybrid plants could have a religious meaning signaling divine presence like Near Eastern hybrid animals (griffins, sphinxes etc) did in similar artistic contexts. Nanno Marinatos (quoted by Chapin 2004: 57) has taken this argument one step further suggesting that such images –and in particular the one depicted in the Monkeys and Blue Birds fresco we will examine in greater detail later- are representations of an ideal Minoan spring connected with fertility and divine intervention in the processes of nature. Chapin (2004: 57) on the other hand suggests that this ‘ideal spring’ is more ‘an eternal, timeless landscape idealized to suggest a supernatural fertility of the earth’. In the combination of real and imagined plants, the Minoan artist was therefore trying to express both the natural environment of Crete in all seasons (by including plants growing during different months) and the magic of the divine power capable of creating new types of plants in an eternal landscape.Scholars, like Schäfer (1989) and Shaw (1993) make analogies with Egypt and suggest that some landscape frescoes could represent real sacred gardens. Connections with Egypt prevail in this discussion. According to Schäfer (1989: 84-85) flower gardens in Egypt were connected with ‘social and religious ritual’. The Minoans were aware of this tradition as contacts with Egypt have been established even from the Pre-Palatial period (Steel 2007: 459).  There have been attempts to justify the idea of Minoan sacred gardens based on the architecture of the palaces. Graham (1987, quoted by Shaw 1993: 680) suggests that there were terraced gardens in the palaces of Knossos, Phaistos and Mallia. Shaw (1993: 680-685) discusses the possible existence of a rock garden in the palace of Phaistos in a relatively private area in the south eastern part of the complex next to the residential quarters. For both Shaw and Schäfer (1989: 86) the sacred garden was a real place in the Minoan palace; a place inspired by Egyptian prototypes and embedded with religious symbolism and probably ritual function. Inside them, there would be cultivated plants and domesticated animals, like monkeys that were imported from Africa, were used as pets and possibly had a religious symbolism as well (Shaw 1993: 675).
Wild landscapes when represented also seem to point to religious interpretations. Rehak (1992: 170-173) examines the iconography of frescoes from Knossos, Ayia Triadha and Thera and suggests that the mountainous topography and the presence of agrimia points to the representation of peak sanctuaries. These were mountain cult places important even from the earliest Minoan periods, where rituals were mostly taken place on the outside close to the natural landscape of Crete (Fitton 2002: 173). The inclusion of a religious sanctuary attributes a clear religious meaning to a work of art, as the image of a cross would do to a modern Christian believer. Rehak’s remarks are based on the close examination of the fresco from room 14 of the Agia Triadha villa. Picture 1 is a reconstruction of the wall painting created by Cameron and used by Rehak and –as long as it is accurate- depicts female figures in two seemingly calm landscapes –one natural and one manmade- and animals running wild in a third.
Reconstruction of the fresco from the villa at Agia Triadha, by M.A.S. Cameron. LM IA, c 1600-1500 BC
Human figures in these contexts are often interpreted as deities or priestesses. Rehak (1992: 168) concludes that ‘the pose and placement’ of the central figure suggest that she is a goddess presiding over the natural world.  Shaw (1993: 673) agrees with Rehak’s suggestion that the central figure is a goddess, but on the other hand interprets the fresco as a deliberate distinction between a wild (where the animals run in the rocky landscape) and a tamed landscape (where the woman seems to be kneeling among cultivated plants). The first female could thus be an actual human in a Minoan sacred garden, while the goddess at the centre can be seen as bridging the gap between the tamed and the wild. Was this distinction important for the Minoan religion? The presence of a section dedicated completely to nature including both flora and fauna could denote ‘the importance of animal and plant fertility’ to Minoan religion (Rehak 1992: 171). It could also symbolize the uncontrollable wild powers of nature and the importance of their taming for the survival of the Minoan civilization. Thus, the sacred gardens were important in the Minoan society as a living symbol of a tamed environment where plants could flourish, animals could live next to humans and deities and rituals could be performed. The representations of such places in art could have magical purposes, aiming at reenacting the magic of nature and serving as a constant reminder of the ideal landscape.

Thursday, 24 March 2011

Artwork of the day


The Grandstand Fresco, c. 1450 BC, Archaeological Museum, Herakleion, Crete

Groups of wealthy Minoan women are often depicted wearing elegant dresses, jewellery and having elaborate hairstyles that echo to a high status appearance and a competitive behaviour that is part of their strategy for maintaining social control.
The Grandstand Fresco is part of the miniature frescoes found within the Palace of Knossos and most probably depicts the tripartite shrine of the palace. The fresco approximately dates to 1450BC and it has been greatly restored by Evans.
In the Grandstand Fresco, the crowds of men and women watching some sort of a court festival differ so much from each other. The artist chooses to emphasize partly the women’s presence and superiority by creating an almost modern time rococo atmosphere contrary to the smaller size women who may be of a lower social status and to men who are all displayed in an identical manner and who give a chaotic sense that characterizes large crowds of people. The highlighted women although being fewer in number, they are the protagonists of the scene because of their large size pointing though at their importance as individuals or even members of special groups within Minoan society. Concentration on their elegant appearance besides indicating that they belong to the highest level of Minoan society, it may denote a change in the social identity of women who use the attire as their key strategy to advocate their power to similar social human groupings. Minoan female dresses are for the first time so much emphasized in the Neopalatial Period that is at a time period when woman instead of being represented as a mother (as it used to), she is depicted as an attractive mate.

Today's artwork is a generous contribution of Eleftheria Pavli, BA, MA

Thursday, 17 March 2011

Artwork of the day


The Chieftain Cup from Aghia Triada, c. 1550-1450 BC, stone, Archaeological Museum, Herakleion, Crete

A group of Minoans that called for the special attention of the elders were the youth. For this reason the Minoan society had priest-leaders who were responsible for the taking care of the young Cretans until the latter became men. These leaders were the supervisors of the closing stages in the initiation of a youth into manhood. A ceremony which involved the rites of passage of most probably local aristocratic youths is likely to be depicted on the Chieftain Cup from Aghia Triada according to one of the various interpretations of the relief scene. Two male figures are represented confronting each other. The young Minoan on the left with the arm over his shoulder (the initiate) is shown receiving orders from his leader-chief before whom he stands (actually he is bending as an act of respect). The leader appears to be slightly larger with the arm stretched out holding a staff in a pose of command, wearing jewellery, high boots and having the characteristic hairstyle and garment (the Minoan lowing cloth) that signifies his role as the priest-ruler of a group. The Chieftain Cup highlights the importance of leadership in Neopalatial Crete that as a principle it started being introduced to the Minoans from a very young age and it was determinant in the shaping of the Minoan personality. Apart from this explanation, the scene on the Chieftain Cup has been interpreted as a king before a god, as a young aristocratic ruler -a prince- who is standing outside his palace in a commanding pose giving orders to one of his officials, or as two young Minoans playing with each other. 

Today's artwork is a generous contribution of Eleftheria Pavli, BA, MA

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

Artwork of the day

The bee pendant, c. 1800-1600 BC, gold, Archaeological Museum, Herakleion, Crete

The bee pendant is an elaborate piece of jewellery found inside a wealthy plundered communal tomb near the palace of Mallia known as the “Chrysolakkos Tomb” (Chrysolakkos means a gold hole). It is a gold pendant that probably dates between 1800 and 1600 BC and represents two bees symmetrically arranged over what seems to be a honeycomb. Above them is a cage with a bead hanging inside it, whereas from the bee wings and tails three gold discs are hanging. The bees are depicted at the moment of placing a drop of honey in a honeycomb. The honeycomb, the bees and the discs are decorated with fine granulation and filigree technique indicating the artistic achievements of the time. The bee pendant, now exhibited at the Herakleion Archaeological Museum, exemplifies not only the use of exotic techniques learned and developed through the regular Minoan contact with the Near East, but also the Minoan desire for the creation of both naturalistic and elaborate designs. As a result the typical Minoan style was born.

Today's artwork is a generous contribution of Eleftheria Pavli, BA, MA

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Artwork of the day


The Phaistos Disc, c. 1700 BC, clay, Archaeological Museum, Herakleion, Crete
The Phaistos Disc was found inside a room at the palace of Phaistos and approximately dates to 1700 BC. It is a circular clay object -almost 15 cm in diameter- stamped with the signs of writing (over 100 types 45 of which are repeated). The signs that are organized in groups and separated by lines form a spiral and they are divided from each other in sections. The text has not been deciphered yet and this has given rise to a lot of disputes regarding its meaning and purpose. Its script differs from other scripts and Linear A. For this reason some say that the disc is an import. Nevertheless, the evidence of the same type of script found in Arkalochori in Crete suggests that it might have co-existed with the Linear A perhaps for specific religious purposes or even used for keeping accounts.

Today's artwork is a generous contribution of Eleftheria Pavli, BA, MA